Diagnosis and Treatment of Diverticular Disease
L. Köhler, S. Sauerland, E. Neugebauer, for the EAES Scientific Committee
Background
With the aim of resolving the current controversy over the diagnosis
and treatment of diverticular disease, this consensus development conference
set out to summarize the actual state of the art 1998.
Methods
A multidisciplinary panel of international experts (n= 16) was selected
to take part in the consensus process. Prior to the conference, all experts
were asked to answer a series of questions on diverticular disease. The
consensus statement compiled out of these evaluations was modified during
a joint meeting of the panel members, then presented for discussion in
a public session, and finally revised by the expert panel. The finalized
statement was mailed to all panel members for approval (Delphi method).
Results
Asymptomatic diverticulosis, diverticular disease (with actual or recurrent
symptoms), and complicated diverticular disease were defined separately.
No agreement was reached on whether barium enema or colonoscopy is the
better choice as an initial diagnostic tool in uncomplicated cases. In
complicated cases, computed tomography is recommended for diagnosis. After
two attacks of diverticular disease, elective resection should be considered.
For patients in whom a concomitant carcinoma cannot be excluded and those
with chronic complications (fistula, stenosis, or bleeding) surgery is
also indicated. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy is recommended only for
uncomplicated and, after percutaneous drainage of abscesses, Hinchey stage
I and II cases.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery has already begun to influence the management
of diverticular disease, but the randomized controlled trials needed to
support therapy decisions are largely missing.
[The full statement can be found here: Surg Endosc 1999;
13: 430-436.]
|